植物科学学报杂志

期刊简介

               《武汉植物学研究》为科学出版社出版的植物学综合性学术期刊(学报级),1983年创刊,国内外公开发行。主编由植物学家黄宏文研究员担任;编委会由国内植物学及各分支学科的专家、学者共47人(其中5位院士)组成。本刊以促进学术交流,推动学科发展,为国民经济建设服务为宗旨,主要报道植物学及各分支学科的基础研究和应用研究方面具创新性、有重要意义的原始研究论文和最新研究成果,植物学研究的新技术、新方法等。栏目设置有:研究论文、技术与方法、综合评述、研究简报、学术讨论、重要书刊评介、学术动态等。主要读者对象为从事植物学研究的科技人员、大专院校师生,以及相关学科的科技工作者。    《武汉植物学研究》是中国科技核心期刊、中国中文核心期刊,已被美国《化学文摘》(CA)、俄罗斯《文摘杂志》(AJ)、美国《生物学文摘》(BA)、日本《科学技术文献速报》(JST)、英国《国际农业与生物科学研究中心》文摘(CABI)、美国《剑桥科学文摘:自然科学》(CSA:NS)、波兰《哥白尼索引》(IC)、中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库、中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD)、中国知识资源总库《中国科技期刊精品数据库》、中国生物学文献数据库、中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库、中国学术期刊综合评价数据库(CAJCED)、中文科技期刊数据库(SWIC)、中国期刊全文数据库(CJFD)、《中国生物学文摘》、《中国农业文摘》、《中国林业文摘》、《中国药学文摘》等20余种数据库或检索期刊收录。现已与美、英、日、瑞士等国家的十多个单位建立了期刊交换关系。本刊曾四次荣获湖北省优秀科技期刊奖,并曾获全国优秀科技期刊奖、中国科学院优秀期刊奖。    《武汉植物学研究》为双月刊,大16开本,全铜版纸印刷。国际标准刊号:ISSN 1000-470X,国内统一刊号:CN 42-1149 / Q。国外由中国国际图书贸易总公司发行,发行代号:BM872;国内邮发代号:38-103,定价15.00元,全年90.00元。    编辑部地址:武汉市武昌磨山中科院武汉植物园内    邮政编码:430074    电话:027-87510755             

论文结论的多样化撰写策略与模板借鉴

时间:2024-07-29 09:59:39

在撰写学术论文的过程中,结论部分往往被误认为仅是前文观点的简单汇总,从而被轻视。尤其是在面对如SSCI实证论文这类高标准写作时,语言障碍和表达限制可能进一步压缩结论的丰富性,导致最终呈现的内容显得单一且缺乏吸引力。实际上,即便是结构严谨的实证研究,其结论也应超越“总结”的范畴,展现出深度分析与前瞻思考。本文基于已发表的SSCI一区论文,提炼出三种富有成效的结论撰写方法。


一、启示引领 + 局限反思 + 建议展望

这是一种经典且实用的结论写法,适合在深入讨论研究结果后,向读者系统展示研究的深远影响、现存局限及未来方向。通过三段式结构,分别阐述研究带来的理论与实践启示、研究过程中的不足,以及针对这些不足提出的改进建议。运用序数词和连词增强条理性,便于读者理解和记忆。


模板句式示例:


This study offers profound implications for both academic research and practical application. In the realm of research, it furnishes empirical evidence for [研究主题], paving the way for its application in empirical inquiries into [其他领域]. Practically speaking, the findings of [研究主题] underscore the model's reliability, enabling its utilization in diverse contexts, including both Western and Eastern settings, to gauge teachers' willingness to teach online through their attitudes and subjective norms.  

 

While this study contributes significantly, it is not without limitations. Chief among them are the relatively small sample size, which may compromise the generalizability of our findings; the potential bias introduced by self-reported data; and the differing educational levels of Chinese and American participants, which may confound our understanding of attitudes towards online teaching. In light of these limitations, future endeavors should strive to incorporate additional factors into the model, thereby enhancing its explanatory power.  

 

Despite these constraints, our findings hold valuable suggestions for both researchers and practitioners in the field. Notably, our study reveals disparities in online teaching attitudes, perceived control, and intentions between Chinese and American pre-service teachers, with perceived control emerging as the most influential factor. This underscores the need to bolster pre-service teachers' sense of control to foster a more positive outlook towards online instruction. Moreover, attitudes towards online teaching emerge as another crucial consideration, underscoring the importance of further inquiry into this dimension.

二、目的回顾 + 必要性重申 + 结果精炼

此方法巧妙地在结论中回顾研究初衷,强调研究在特定背景下的必要性和紧迫性,随后精炼概括核心研究结果,形成与前文内容的紧密呼应。


模板句式示例:


This investigation was undertaken with the express purpose of examining the efficacy of [具体教学方法], particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, which necessitated a swift transition to online learning environments. The imperative for this research was undeniable, as universities worldwide scrambled to maintain educational continuity amidst the crisis, highlighting the safety and accessibility of [具体教学方法] for both students and educators. Our analysis reveals that [研究结果简述], reinforcing the notion that [具体教学方法] can mitigate certain challenges posed by remote learning, albeit with room for improvement in areas such as interactive engagement.

三、现状概览 + 创新亮点 + 局限剖析 + 未来展望

此结构在全面审视当前研究领域的基础上,突出本研究的创新贡献,同时诚实地剖析存在的局限,并对未来研究方向提出展望,展现出研究的科学严谨与前瞻视野。


模板句式示例:


To date, scholarly endeavors have predominantly concentrated on [当前研究现状]. This study, however, takes a novel approach by examining [具体研究问题], leveraging a robust and representative sample to uncover unprecedented findings: [研究结果简述], which underscores the [具体创新点]. Recognizing the novelty of our inquiry, it is plausible that similar outcomes may be replicated across diverse populations and platforms.  

 

Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge the limitations inherent in any research endeavor. A noteworthy constraint of this study lies in the exclusive reliance on [数据来源或方法], potentially limiting the generalizability of our conclusions. Consequently, future research should endeavor to diversify data collection strategies, ensuring a broader representation of participants. Additionally, the unexplored avenues hinted at by our hypotheses [具体假设] offer fertile ground for further exploration, presenting exciting prospects for the advancement of this field.

小结

综上所述,论文结论的撰写远非简单的观点堆砌,而是需要融入深刻的思考、前瞻的视野及对研究全貌的精准把握。通过灵活运用上述三种撰写策略,不仅能够丰富结论的内容层次,还能有效提升论文的整体质量与影响力。